Murphy Klasing’s Conservative Blog

The Marriage Reformation-Tradition/Schlamition

Since the Republican YouTube debate, the issue of gay marriage has appeared back on the headlines.  Time to look at our traditional marriage situation and decide whether it is time for a change.  I mean after all, marriage is a VERY old notion.  I think it was Genesis where the first marriage occurred.  That was between a man and a woman-how quaint.  But now, we have the world asking the question–Why can’t I marry who or whatever I want?  Let’s try and answer this question.

First-here are what the Democrats are saying: (These quotes taken from About.com except for some possible additions to Dennis Kucinich’s)

–Although Barack Obama has said that he supports civil unions, he is against gay marriage. In an interview with the Chicago Daily Tribune, Obama said, “I’m a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

There Barack goes playing that “tradition” card.  Well, he is obviously looking backwards, how about Hillary?

  Clinton opposes gay marriage but supports civil unions between members of the same sex. During her husband’s administration, she supported the Defense of Marriage Act, a law preventing the federal recognition of same-sex marriage.  “Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage always has been, between a man and a woman.” – Hillary Clinton, opposing same-sex marriages, quoted in The New York Daily News.  However, in October 2006 Hillary Clinton was quoted by 365gay.com as saying,”I believe in full equality of benefits, nothing left out. From my perspective there is a greater likelihood of us getting to that point in civil unions or domestic partnerships and that is my very considered assessment.”

So she sort-of played the “tradition” card, then she was against it before she was for it.  Wha???  How about Dennis Kucinich?

 “Kucinich goes further than supporting civil unions for same-sex couples at the state level; he believes that, much like Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s, federal law should protect civil unions, and that no state has a right to abridge basic rights to privacy. ” On his website Dennis Kucinich says, “On May 17th, 2004, the 50th anniversary of the decision in Brown vs. the Board of Education that declared “separate” is not “equal,” the people of the state of Massachusetts became a part of another such moment in history when the legally empowered and legally protected right of civil marriage is finally extended to all citizens, regardless of gender. The decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to recognize and uphold this civil right is a victory not just for gay and lesbian citizens who have been denied their civil rights and relegated to second-class status. It is a victory for all Americans who believe, as I do, that the promise of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights should be upheld for everyone.  Further, I wholeheartedly support any marriage between a citizen of Earth and a citizen of Yendor in the Galgana Galaxy–their species is so cute.”

Apparently, Dennis is on board to allow all kinds of marriage–in fact he even pretends that the Constitution and Bill of Rights says something about it.  Cool.  How about the Breck girl?

  Edwards opposes same-sex marriage, but he does not think the Constitution should be amended to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He supports civil unions.  On 2/24/04 Edwards said in response to President Bush’s proposed Constitutional amendment, “I am against the president’s constitutional amendment on gay marriage…I don’t personally support gay marriage myself. My position has always been that it’s for the states to decide.” Edwards supports the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act.

So Edwards would rather the Government not get involved in this ONE AND ONLY area of our lives–but that is it–every other area–okay, but not this ONE AREA.  (Nice cop-out).

  So what is the answer?  “Once we have abandoned the concept of marriage as the union of a man and a woman, [we] will have no principled basis for rejecting polygamy – or any form of sexual involvement,” explained Princeton Law Professor Robert George.  That is one opinion.  Many say that we are heading down a path of destroying the family which forms the basis of our Country.

But I have a different question today–what about those of us who love in an even different way?  If we are going to redefine marriage, it seems only fair to redefine it completely.  Since the divorce rate is now 1 in 1.8 marriages we are obviously failing.  I think it is because people are no longer marrying their “best friends.”  They are marrying for the wrong reasons.  As a man, I can only write from the male perspective on this–for those who think this path is really not sliding down to the ridiculous take a look at this:

 (viewer discretion is advised<–pretend that this is said in that creepy voice from “24”)

P. Selvakumar places a garland on Selvi, a former stray dog, during their wedding in Manamadurai, India, Nov. 11. Selvakumar said he thinks he was cursed for stoning two other dogs to death and wed Selvi in an atonement attempt.

Don’t you dare judge poor P.  He and Selvi are on honeymoon in the Purina Valley taking tours of dog food factories and having a ball in the tasting rooms.  If you think about it, P. may have something (except an actual first name).

Here are the ways that dogs might make a better spouse than humans:

and for the women:

 Well, I think the Republicans need to look seriously at this–a good first step would be to announce immediately that their running mate, should he be elected in the primary will be one of the following:

 or maybe   or maybe  or maybe

 Here are the reasons: 

1.  No one will call the dog “Darth Vader”

2.  No one will say, “Where has the VP been”  because he will always be in the yard.

3.  The VP debate will be about 2 minutes long.  Hands down the dog will win.

4.  Everyone loves dogs–if they don’t then they should be shot anyway.

5. He can run an effective puppet regime with whoever the President is.

So come on America–let’s vote to change marriage–no longer just between a man and a woman but let’s pass the “P. Amendment” and allow marriage between a person and a dog.  Then if you marry someone like this no one will know the difference:

-Murphy