Bill Clinton is Practicing Law Without a License!

I hate to “drudge” up the past.  Republicans are always accused of Clinton bashing, but sometimes it is so hard to resist.  Remember that President Clinton was stripped of his Arkansas Law License as a consequence of giving “inaccurate” responses to questions about himself an a former White House intern.  It was a 5-year suspension which ended in late January 2006.  I checked the Arkansas Bar Website and under his name there is no indication he ever had the license reinstated although he may have applied for reinstatement in New York.  I checked there as well and there is no record that he obtained a license in New York.  Therefore I must conclude that he does not have one.

 YET–he appears to be acting in a legal capacity for his daughter Chelsea.  In an article out today ( President Clinton is asking a restaurant owner to take down a picture of Chelsea and the owner that is hanging in the restaurant.

The restaurant, Osso Buco in Manhattan has numerous pictures of “celebrities” hanging inside.  The owner stated that the picture of Chelsea has been there for years and she has eaten there many times.  Suddenly, however, President Clinton, on his own letterhead sent a “demand letter” to the owner demanding that it come down since she is a “private citizen.”  The letter stated  “We reserve the right to exercise any and all options available to us if you refuse to comply.”

Now this is really funny.  It is kind of sad though.  I mean, I suppose he is just simply bored.  His wife is not taking him on many of her campaign stops and Chelsea apparently has a life too busy to complain about her photograph hanging up in a restaurant so Bill decides to play lawyer.  The problem is that he isn’t one anymore.  I assume he can hire one.  I’d offer but suddenly I feel very busy–probably too busy to effectively help his poor, mistreated, victimized, and terrorized daughter. 

I think the jury in this matter should ultimately award $1.6 million dollars in punitive damages.  Not for misusing the photograph or “violating her privacy,” which is  a loser cause of action but instead for placing a photograph of the daughter of an economic liberal in a capitalistic venture–such as a restaurant.  It is confusing and sends conflicting messages to our youth.  And after all, it is the children we need to save.  So let’s all pray (but not in our school) that Chelsea wins her day in Court, that she finds an actual licensed attorney to handle her case and that the children who come to Osso Buco to eat $1000 pizzas are no longer confused about the differences in capitalism and socialism.  Send a message America!  Send it loud and clear.

By the way–to show that I am not hypocritical about this I will delete my Chelsea Clinton wallpaper on my computer right now since I didn’t have authorization to use that either.


P.S.  If you go to Google Images and search “Chelsea Clinton” 7090 images come up.  I’m working on lawsuits against each and every one of those picture theiving opportunists.

Explore posts in the same categories: Current Events, Humor, Law, Life, News, Politics

7 Comments on “Bill Clinton is Practicing Law Without a License!”

  1. Andrew Wang Says:

    Speaking of Bill Clinton:

    It is opined that Bill Clinton committed racist hate crimes, and I am not free to say anything further about it.

    Respectfully Submitted by Andrew Y. Wang, J.D. Candidate
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    (I can type 90 words per minute, and there are probably thousands of copies on the Internet indicating the content of this post.)
    “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Off the top of my head—it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

  2. Buzz Says:

    Simply sending a demand letter is not being a lawyer. ANYONE can send a letter demanding something. Doesn’t mean you are an attorney.

    I could send one to you demanding you stop writing. Doesn’t mean anything. Clinton’s letter carries a great deal of weight simply because of who he is, but nonetheless you are nitpicking here.

    • mklasing Says:

      Wow–judging by your comment I’d say you are the authority on nitpicking. By the way–the title is meant to be a little tongue and cheek–don’t worry, I’m not accusing your beloved former President of REALLY breaking the law–besides he did enough of that when he lied under oath.

  3. Ed Says:

    It appears Buzz out witted you. I agree with him. I do not agree with your sarcasm and rudeness

  4. mklasing Says:

    Thanks Ed–I must say, the fact that someone disagrees with me is hard to accept–sorry, that was sarcasm. If I was rude, however, I apologize. (now the question is–is that sarcasm or is it genuine? we may never know.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: